2. Dutiya-aniyatasikkh±padavaŗŗan±

452. “Na labhati m±tug±mena saddhi½ eko ek±ya…pe… nisajja½ kappetun”tiavatv± “paµikkhitta½ m±tug±men±”ti-±din± vuttatt± “eko”ti paccattapada½paµikkhittapadena na sameti, “ekass±”ti vattabboti s±dhento ±ha “itarath± h²”ti-±di.

453. PariveŗaŖgaŗ±d²ti pariveŗassa m±¼aka½. ¾di-saddena p±k±r±diparikkhitta½cetiyam±¼ak±di½ saŖgaŗh±ti. Antogadhanti appaµicchannaµµh±ne eva pariy±panna½. Idhaitth²pi an±patti½ karot²ti sambandho. Kasm± pana itth² idheva an±patti½ karoti,na purimasikkh±padeti? Imassa sikkh±padassa methuna½ vin± duµµhullav±c±ya vasena ±gatatt±.Methunameva hi itthiyo ańńamańńa½ paµicch±denti mah±vane dv±ra½ vivaritv± nidd³pagatamhibhikkhumhi viya. Duµµhulla½ pana na paµicch±denti, teneva duµµhullav±c±sikkh±pade“y± t± itthiyo hiriman±, t± nikkhamitv± bhikkh³ ujjh±pesun”ti (p±r±. 283)vutta½, tasm± “itth²pi an±patti½ karot²”ti vutta½, “appaµicchannaµµh±natt±”tipik±raŗa½ vadanti.

K±yen±pi duµµhullobh±sasambhavato imasmi½ sikkh±pade cakkhussa raho, sotassa raho ca adhippetoti±ha “anandho abadhiro”ti-±di. Keci pana vibhaŖge “n±la½ kammaniyantina sakk± hoti methuna½ dhamma½ paµisevitun’ti (p±r±. 454) ettakameva vatv±‘na sakk± hoti k±yasa½sagga½ sam±pajjitun’ti avuttatt± appaµicchannepi µh±ne rahoańńesa½ abh±va½ disv± ek±ya itthiy± k±yasa½saggopi sakk± ±pajjitunti antodv±dasahatthesavan³pac±re µhito abadhiropi andho k±yasa½saggass±pi sabbh±v±bh±va½ na j±n±t²ti k±yenaduµµhullobh±sanasabbh±va½ amanasikatv±pi k±yasa½sagg±pattiy±pi parih±r±ya anandho abadhiroti-±divuttan”ti vadanti. Ya½ pana s±ratthad²paniya½ “k±yasa½saggavasena anandho vutto”ti(s±rattha. µ². 2.453) vutta½, ta½ pana k±yena duµµhullobh±sanasambhava½ amanasikatv±vutta½, k±yasa½saggavasen±p²ti gahetabba½. Teneva “imasmi½ sikkh±pade sotassa rahoeva adhippeto…pe… kenaci pana ‘dvepi rah± idha adhippet±’ti vutta½, ta½ na gahetabban”tivutta½. Ya½ pana cakkhussa rah±bh±vas±dhanattha½ “na hi appaµicchanne ok±se cakkhussaraho sambhavat²”ti-±di vutta½, ta½ na yutta½ atid³ratare µhitassa k±yena obh±sanampihatthagg±h±d²nipi sallakkhetu½ asakkuŗeyyatt±. Teneva p±¼iya½ “cakkhussa raho”tivutta½, aµµhakath±ya½ appaµikkhitta½. Na kevalańca appaµikkhitta½, atha kho “anandhobadhiroti ca andho v± abadhiropi na karot²”ti ca vutta½, tasm± dvepi rah± idha gahetabb±.“Antodv±dasahatthe”ti-imin± sotassa raho dv±dasahatthena paricchinnoti ida½ dasseti.Cakkhussa raho pana yattha µhitassa k±yavik±r±dayo na pańń±yanti, tena paricchinditabbotidaµµhabba½. Badhiro pana cakkhum±p²ti duµµhullav±c±saŖgh±disesa½ sandh±ya vutta½. Duµµhull±pattivutt±ti purimasikkh±pade vuttehi adhikavasena duµµhull±patti ca vutt±ti evamatthogahetabbo, na pana duµµhull±patti ev±ti k±yasa½saggass±pi idha gahetabbato. Teneva “p±r±jik±pattińcaparih±petv±”ti ettakameva vutta½, itarath± “k±yasa½saggańc±”ti vattabba½bhaveyya.

Tisamuµµh±nanti-±di pana purimasikkh±pade ±gatehi adhikassa duµµhullav±c±saŖgh±disesassavasena vutta½ k±yasa½sagg±d²nampi purimasikkh±pade eva vuttatt±, idha pana na vuttantipivadanti, v²ma½sitv± gahetabba½.

Dutiya-aniyatasikkh±padavaŗŗan± niµµhit±.

Niµµhito aniyatavaŗŗan±nayo.