2-3-4. Dutiyatatiyacatutthasikkh±padavaººan±

842-6. Dutiyatatiyacatutth±ni utt±n±ni. Sabbattha “sallapat²ti ya½ kiñci tiracch±nakatha½kathet²”ti por±ºagaºµhipade vutta½.
852. Catutthe pan±ya½ viseso– “ekenek±”ti paµhama½ vuttatt± dutiyika½ v±bhikkhun²na½ uyyojeyya, p±cittiya½ na sambhavat²ti ce? Sambhavati. Kasm±? Santiµµhan±dittayamatt±pekkhatt±,tassa vacanass±pi v± aññ±yapi rahopekkhanass±dasambhave sati ubhinna½ ekatthasambhavato cas±dhitameta½. “Hatthap±sa½ vijahitv± santiµµhati v± sallapati v±”ti ettakamevavutta½. Kasm± “nikaººika½ v± jappet²”ti na vutta½? Hatthap±s±tikkameasambhavato. Tassa tatiyassa padassa pacchinnatt± sambhavantampi “dutiyika½ v± uyyojet²”tina vutta½, tasm± atthato hatthap±sa½ vijahitv± santiµµhati v± sallapati v± dutiyika½v± uyyojeti, ±patti dukkaµass±ti vutta½ hoti. Esa nayo yakkhena v±ti-±d²supi.Tattha “hatthap±se”ti v± “hatthap±sa½ vijahitv±”ti v± na vutta½ ubhayattha dukkaµatt±.An±pattiv±repi asambhavato “nikaººika½ v± jappet²”ti na vuttanti ce? Sambhavatisati karaº²ye nikaººika½ v± jappet²ti sambhavato. Atha kasm± eva½ na vuttantice? Anavajjakath±ya½ nikaººikajappane payojan±bh±v±, dhammakath±yampi ud±yi½ ±rabbhapaµisiddhatt± ca.

Dutiyatatiyacatutthasikkh±padavaººan± niµµhit±.