10. Tapussasutta½

41. Eka½ samaya½ bhagav± mallesu viharati uruvelakappa½ n±ma mall±na½ nigamo. Atha kho bhagav± pubbaŗhasamaya½ niv±setv± pattac²varam±d±ya uruvelakappa½ piŗ¹±ya p±visi. Uruvelakappe piŗ¹±ya caritv± pacch±bhatta½ piŗ¹ap±tapaµikkanto ±yasmanta½ ±nanda½ ±mantesi– “idheva t±va tva½, ±nanda, hohi, y±v±ha½ mah±vana½ ajjhog±h±mi div±vih±r±y±”ti. “Eva½, bhante”ti kho ±yasm± ±nando bhagavato paccassosi. Atha kho bhagav± mah±vana½ ajjhog±hetv± ańńatarasmi½ rukkham³le div±vih±ra½ nis²di.
Atha kho tapusso gahapati yen±yasm± ±nando tenupasaŖkami; upasaŖkamitv± ±yasmanta½ ±nanda½ abhiv±detv± ekamanta½ nis²di. Ekamanta½ nisinno kho tapusso gahapati ±yasmanta½ ±nanda½ etadavoca–
“Maya½, bhante ±nanda, gih² k±mabhogino k±m±r±m± k±marat± k±masammudit±. Tesa½ no, bhante, amh±ka½ gih²na½ k±mabhog²na½ k±m±r±m±na½ k±marat±na½ k±masammudit±na½ pap±to viya kh±yati, yadida½ nekkhamma½. Suta½ meta½, bhante, ‘imasmi½ dhammavinaye dahar±na½ dahar±na½ bhikkh³na½ nekkhamme citta½ pakkhandati pas²dati santiµµhati vimuccati eta½ santanti passato’ [passata½ (?)]. Tayida½, bhante, imasmi½ dhammavinaye bhikkh³na½ bahun± janena visabh±go, yadida½ nekkhamman”ti.
“Atthi kho eta½, gahapati, kath±p±bhata½ bhagavanta½ dassan±ya. ¾y±ma, gahapati, yena bhagav± tenupasaŖkamiss±ma; upasaŖkamitv± bhagavato etamattha½ ±rocess±ma. Yath± no bhagav± by±karissati tath± na½ dh±ress±m±”ti.
“Eva½, bhante”ti kho tapusso gahapati ±yasmato ±nandassa paccassosi. Atha kho ±yasm± ±nando tapussena gahapatin± saddhi½ yena bhagav± tenupasaŖkami; upasaŖkamitv± bhagavanta½ abhiv±detv± ekamanta½ nis²di. Ekamanta½ nisinno kho ±yasm± ±nando bhagavanta½ etadavoca–
“Aya½ bhante, tapusso gahapati evam±ha– ‘maya½, bhante ±nanda, gih² k±mabhogino k±m±r±m± k±marat± k±masammudit±, tesa½ no bhante, amh±ka½ gih²na½ k±mabhog²na½ k±m±r±m±na½ k±marat±na½ k±masammudit±na½ pap±to viya kh±yati, yadida½ nekkhamma½’. Suta½ meta½, bhante, ‘imasmi½ dhammavinaye dahar±na½ dahar±na½ bhikkh³na½ nekkhamme citta½ pakkhandati pas²dati santiµµhati vimuccati eta½ santanti passato. Tayida½, bhante, imasmi½ dhammavinaye bhikkh³na½ bahun± janena visabh±go yadida½ nekkhamma”n’ti.
“Evameta½, ±nanda, evameta½, ±nanda! Mayhampi kho, ±nanda, pubbeva sambodh± anabhisambuddhassa bodhisattasseva sato etadahosi– ‘s±dhu nekkhamma½ s±dhu paviveko’ti. Tassa mayha½, ±nanda, nekkhamme citta½ na pakkhandati nappas²dati na santiµµhati na vimuccati eta½ santanti passato. Tassa mayha½, ±nanda, etadahosi– ‘ko nu kho hetu ko paccayo, yena me nekkhamme citta½ na pakkhandati nappas²dati na santiµµhati na vimuccati eta½ santanti passato’? Tassa mayha½, ±nanda, etadahosi– ‘k±mesu kho me ±d²navo adiµµho, so ca me abahul²kato, nekkhamme ca ±nisa½so anadhigato, so ca me an±sevito Tasm± me nekkhamme citta½ na pakkhandati nappas²dati na santiµµhati na vimuccati eta½ santanti passato’. Tassa mayha½, ±nanda, etadahosi– ‘sace kho aha½ k±mesu ±d²nava½ disv± ta½ bahula½ kareyya½ [bahul²kareyya½ (s². sy±. p².)], nekkhamme ±nisa½sa½ adhigamma tam±seveyya½, µh±na½ kho paneta½ vijjati ya½ me nekkhamme citta½ pakkhandeyya pas²deyya santiµµheyya vimucceyya eta½ santanti passato’. So kho aha½, ±nanda, aparena samayena k±mesu ±d²nava½ disv± ta½ bahulamak±si½, nekkhamme ±nisa½sa½ adhigamma tam±sevi½. Tassa mayha½, ±nanda, nekkhamme citta½ pakkhandati pas²dati santiµµhati vimuccati eta½ santanti passato. So kho aha½, ±nanda, vivicceva k±mehi vivicca akusalehi dhammehi savitakka½ savic±ra½ vivekaja½ p²tisukha½ paµhama½ jh±na½ upasampajja vihar±mi. Tassa mayha½, ±nanda, imin± vih±rena viharato k±masahagat± sańń±manasik±r± samud±caranti. Svassa me hoti ±b±dho Seyyath±pi, ±nanda, sukhino dukkha½ uppajjeyya y±vadeva ±b±dh±ya; evamevassa me k±masahagat± sańń±manasik±r± samud±caranti. Svassa me hoti ±b±dho.
“Tassa mayha½, ±nanda, etadahosi– ‘ya½n³n±ha½ vitakkavic±r±na½ v³pasam±…pe… dutiya½ jh±na½ upasampajja vihareyyan’ti. Tassa mayha½, ±nanda, avitakke citta½ na pakkhandati nappas²dati na santiµµhati na vimuccati eta½ santanti passato. Tassa mayha½, ±nanda, etadahosi– ‘ko nu kho hetu ko paccayo, yena me avitakke citta½ na pakkhandati nappas²dati na santiµµhati na vimuccati eta½ santanti passato’? Tassa mayha½, ±nanda, etadahosi– ‘vitakkesu kho me ±d²navo adiµµho, so ca me abahul²kato, avitakke ca ±nisa½so anadhigato, so ca me an±sevito. Tasm± me avitakke citta½ na pakkhandati nappas²dati na santiµµhati na vimuccati eta½ santanti passato’. Tassa mayha½, ±nanda, etadahosi– ‘sace kho aha½ vitakkesu ±d²nava½ disv± ta½ bahula½ kareyya½, avitakke ±nisa½sa½ adhigamma tam±seveyya½, µh±na½ kho paneta½ vijjati ya½ me avitakke citta½ pakkhandeyya pas²deyya santiµµheyya vimucceyya eta½ santanti passato’. So kho aha½, ±nanda, aparena samayena vitakkesu ±d²nava½ disv± ta½ bahulamak±si½, avitakke ±nisa½sa½ adhigamma tam±sevi½. Tassa mayha½, ±nanda, avitakke citta½ pakkhandati pas²dati santiµµhati vimuccati eta½ santanti passato. So kho aha½, ±nanda, vitakkavic±r±na½ v³pasam±…pe… dutiya½ jh±na½ upasampajja vihar±mi. Tassa mayha½, ±nanda, imin± vih±rena viharato vitakkasahagat± sańń±manasik±r± samud±caranti. Svassa me hoti ±b±dho. Seyyath±pi, ±nanda, sukhino dukkha½ uppajjeyya y±vadeva ±b±dh±ya; evamevassa me vitakkasahagat± sańń±manasik±r± samud±caranti. Svassa me hoti ±b±dho.
“Tassa mayha½, ±nanda, etadahosi– ‘ya½n³n±ha½ p²tiy± ca vir±g± upekkhako ca vihareyya½ sato ca sampaj±no sukhańca k±yena paµisa½vedeyya½ ya½ ta½ ariy± ±cikkhanti– upekkhako satim± sukhavih±r²ti tatiya½ jh±na½ upasampajja vihareyyan’ti. Tassa mayha½, ±nanda, nipp²tike citta½ na pakkhandati nappas²dati na santiµµhati na vimuccati eta½ santanti passato. Tassa mayha½, ±nanda, etadahosi– ‘ko nu kho hetu ko paccayo yena me nipp²tike citta½ na pakkhandati nappas²dati na santiµµhati na vimuccati eta½ santanti passato’? Tassa mayha½, ±nanda, etadahosi– ‘p²tiy± kho me ±d²navo adiµµho, so ca me abahul²kato, nipp²tike ca ±nisa½so anadhigato, so ca me an±sevito. Tasm± me nipp²tike citta½ na pakkhandati nappas²dati na santiµµhati na vimuccati eta½ santanti passato’. Tassa mayha½, ±nanda, etadahosi– ‘sace kho aha½ p²tiy± ±d²nava½ disv± ta½ bahula½ kareyya½, nipp²tike ±nisa½sa½ adhigamma tam±seveyya½, µh±na½ kho paneta½ vijjati ya½ me nipp²tike citta½ pakkhandeyya pas²deyya santiµµheyya vimucceyya eta½ santanti passato’. So kho aha½, ±nanda, aparena samayena p²tiy± ±d²nava½ disv± ta½ bahulamak±si½, nipp²tike ±nisa½sa½ adhigamma tam±sevi½. Tassa mayha½, ±nanda, nipp²tike citta½ pakkhandati pas²dati santiµµhati vimuccati eta½ santanti passato. So kho aha½, ±nanda, p²tiy± ca vir±g±…pe… tatiya½ jh±na½ upasampajja vihar±mi. Tassa mayha½, ±nanda, imin± vih±rena viharato p²tisahagat± sańń±manasik±r± samud±caranti. Svassa me hoti ±b±dho. Seyyath±pi, ±nanda, sukhino dukkha½ uppajjeyya y±vadeva ±b±dh±ya; evamevassa me p²tisahagat± sańń±manasik±r± samud±caranti. Svassa me hoti ±b±dho.
“Tassa mayha½, ±nanda, etadahosi– ‘ya½n³n±ha½ sukhassa ca pah±n± dukkhassa ca pah±n± pubbeva somanassadomanass±na½ atthaŖgam± adukkhamasukha½ upekkh±satip±risuddhi½ catuttha½ jh±na½ upasampajja vihareyyan’ti. Tassa mayha½, ±nanda, adukkhamasukhe citta½ na pakkhandati nappas²dati na santiµµhati na vimuccati eta½ santanti passato. Tassa mayha½, ±nanda, etadahosi– ‘ko nu kho hetu ko paccayo, yena me adukkhamasukhe citta½ na pakkhandati nappas²dati na santiµµhati na vimuccati eta½ santanti passato’? Tassa mayha½, ±nanda, etadahosi– ‘upekkh±sukhe kho me ±d²navo adiµµho, so ca me abahul²kato, adukkhamasukhe ca ±nisa½so anadhigato, so ca me an±sevito. Tasm± me adukkhamasukhe citta½ na pakkhandati nappas²dati na santiµµhati na vimuccati eta½ santanti passato’. Tassa mayha½, ±nanda, etadahosi– ‘sace kho aha½ upekkh±sukhe ±d²nava½ disv± ta½ bahula½ kareyya½, adukkhamasukhe ±nisa½sa½ adhigamma tam±seveyya½, µh±na½ kho paneta½ vijjati ya½ me adukkhamasukhe citta½ pakkhandeyya pas²deyya santiµµheyya vimucceyya eta½ santanti passato’. So kho aha½, ±nanda, aparena samayena upekkh±sukhe ±d²nava½ disv± ta½ bahulamak±si½ adukkhamasukhe ±nisa½sa½ adhigamma tam±sevi½. Tassa mayha½, ±nanda, adukkhamasukhe citta½ pakkhandati pas²dati santiµµhati vimuccati eta½ santanti passato. So kho aha½, ±nanda, sukhassa ca pah±n±…pe… catuttha½ jh±na½ upasampajja vihar±mi. Tassa mayha½, ±nanda, imin± vih±rena viharato upekkh±sahagat± sańń±manasik±r± samud±caranti. Svassa me hoti ±b±dho. Seyyath±pi, ±nanda, sukhino dukkha½ uppajjeyya y±vadeva ±b±dh±ya; evamevassa me upekkh±sahagat± sańń±manasik±r± samud±caranti. Svassa me hoti ±b±dho.
“Tassa mayha½, ±nanda, etadahosi– ‘ya½n³n±ha½ sabbaso r³pasańń±na½ samatikkam± paµighasańń±na½ atthaŖgam± n±nattasańń±na½ amanasik±r± “ananto ±k±so”ti ±k±s±nańc±yatana½ upasampajja vihareyyan’ti. Tassa mayha½, ±nanda, ±k±s±nańc±yatane citta½ na pakkhandati nappas²dati na santiµµhati na vimuccati eta½ santanti passato. Tassa mayha½, ±nanda, etadahosi– ‘ko nu kho hetu ko paccayo, yena me ±k±s±nańc±yatane citta½ na pakkhandati nappas²dati na santiµµhati na vimuccati eta½ santanti passato’? Tassa mayha½, ±nanda, etadahosi– ‘r³pesu kho me ±d²navo adiµµho, so ca abahul²kato, ±k±s±nańc±yatane ca ±nisa½so anadhigato, so ca me an±sevito. Tasm± me ±k±s±nańc±yatane citta½ na pakkhandati nappas²dati na santiµµhati na vimuccati eta½ santanti passato’. Tassa mayha½, ±nanda, etadahosi– ‘sace kho aha½ r³pesu ±d²nava½ disv± ta½ bahula½ kareyya½, ±k±s±nańc±yatane ±nisa½sa½ adhigamma tam±seveyya½, µh±na½ kho paneta½ vijjati ya½ me ±k±s±nańc±yatane citta½ pakkhandeyya pas²deyya santiµµheyya vimucceyya eta½ santanti passato’. So kho aha½, ±nanda, aparena samayena r³pesu ±d²nava½ disv± ta½ bahulamak±si½, ±k±s±nańc±yatane ±nisa½sa½ adhigamma tam±sevi½. Tassa mayha½, ±nanda, ±k±s±nańc±yatane citta½ pakkhandati pas²dati santiµµhati vimuccati eta½ santanti passato. So kho aha½, ±nanda, sabbaso r³pasańń±na½ samatikkam± paµighasańń±na½ atthaŖgam± n±nattasańń±na½ amanasik±r± ‘ananto ±k±so’ti ±k±s±nańc±yatana½ upasampajja vihar±mi. Tassa mayha½, ±nanda, imin± vih±rena viharato r³pasahagat± sańń±manasik±r± samud±caranti. Svassa me hoti ±b±dho. Seyyath±pi, ±nanda, sukhino dukkha½ uppajjeyya y±vadeva ±b±dh±ya; evamevassa me r³pasahagat± sańń±manasik±r± samud±caranti. Svassa me hoti ±b±dho.
“Tassa mayha½, ±nanda, etadahosi– ‘ya½n³n±ha½ sabbaso ±k±s±nańc±yatana½ samatikkamma “ananta½ vińń±ŗan”ti vińń±ŗańc±yatana½ upasampajja vihareyyan’ti. Tassa mayha½, ±nanda, vińń±ŗańc±yatane citta½ na pakkhandati nappas²dati na santiµµhati na vimuccati eta½ santanti passato. Tassa mayha½, ±nanda, etadahosi– ‘ko nu kho hetu ko paccayo, yena me vińń±ŗańc±yatane citta½ na pakkhandati nappas²dati na santiµµhati na vimuccati eta½ santanti passato’? Tassa mayha½, ±nanda, etadahosi– ‘±k±s±nańc±yatane kho me ±d²navo adiµµho, so ca abahul²kato, vińń±ŗańc±yatane ca ±nisa½so anadhigato, so ca me an±sevito. Tasm± me vińń±ŗańc±yatane citta½ na pakkhandati nappas²dati na santiµµhati na vimuccati eta½ santanti passato’. Tassa mayha½, ±nanda, etadahosi– ‘sace kho aha½ ±k±s±nańc±yatane ±d²nava½ disv± ta½ bahula½ kareyya½, vińń±ŗańc±yatane ±nisa½sa½ adhigamma tam±seveyya½, µh±na½ kho paneta½ vijjati ya½ me vińń±ŗańc±yatane citta½ pakkhandeyya pas²deyya santiµµheyya vimucceyya eta½ santanti passato’. So kho aha½, ±nanda, aparena samayena ±k±s±nańc±yatane ±d²nava½ disv± ta½ bahulamak±si½, vińń±ŗańc±yatane ±nisa½sa½ adhigamma tam±sevi½. Tassa mayha½, ±nanda, vińń±ŗańc±yatane citta½ pakkhandati pas²dati santiµµhati vimuccati eta½ santanti passato. So kho aha½, ±nanda, sabbaso ±k±s±nańc±yatana½ samatikkamma ‘ananta½ vińń±ŗan’ti vińń±ŗańc±yatana½ upasampajja vihar±mi. Tassa mayha½, ±nanda, imin± vih±rena viharato ±k±s±nańc±yatanasahagat± sańń±manasik±r± samud±caranti. Svassa me hoti ±b±dho. Seyyath±pi, ±nanda, sukhino dukkha½ uppajjeyya y±vadeva ±b±dh±ya evamevassa me ±k±s±nańc±yatanasahagat± sańń±manasik±r± samud±caranti. Svassa me hoti ±b±dho.
“Tassa mayha½, ±nanda, etadahosi– ‘ya½n³n±ha½ sabbaso vińń±ŗańc±yatana½ samatikkamma natthi kińc²ti ±kińcańń±yatana½ upasampajja vihareyyan’ti. Tassa mayha½, ±nanda, ±kińcańń±yatane citta½ na pakkhandati nappas²dati na santiµµhati na vimuccati eta½ santanti passato. Tassa mayha½, ±nanda, etadahosi– ‘ko nu kho hetu ko paccayo, yena me ±kińcańń±yatane citta½ na pakkhandati nappas²dati na santiµµhati na vimuccati eta½ santanti passato’? Tassa mayha½, ±nanda, etadahosi– ‘vińń±ŗańc±yatane kho me ±d²navo adiµµho, so ca me abahul²kato, ±kińcańń±yatane ca ±nisa½so anadhigato, so ca me an±sevito. Tasm± me ±kińcańń±yatane citta½ na pakkhandati nappas²dati na santiµµhati na vimuccati eta½ santanti passato’. Tassa mayha½, ±nanda, etadahosi– ‘sace kho aha½ vińń±ŗańc±yatane ±d²nava½ disv± ta½ bahula½ kareyya½, ±kińcańń±yatane ±nisa½sa½ adhigamma tam±seveyya½, µh±na½ kho paneta½ vijjati ya½ me ±kińcańń±yatane citta½ pakkhandeyya pas²deyya santiµµheyya vimucceyya eta½ santanti passato’. So kho aha½, ±nanda, aparena samayena vińń±ŗańc±yatane ±d²nava½ disv± ta½ bahulamak±si½, ±kińcańń±yatane ±nisa½sa½ adhigamma tam±sevi½. Tassa mayha½, ±nanda, ±kińcańń±yatane citta½ pakkhandati pas²dati santiµµhati vimuccati eta½ santanti passato. So kho aha½, ±nanda, sabbaso vińń±ŗańc±yatana½ samatikkamma ‘natthi kińc²’ti ±kińcańń±yatana½ upasampajja vihar±mi. Tassa mayha½, ±nanda, imin± vih±rena viharato vińń±ŗańc±yatanasahagat± sańń±manasik±r± samud±caranti. Svassa me hoti ±b±dho. Seyyath±pi, ±nanda, sukhino dukkha½ uppajjeyya y±vadeva ±b±dh±ya; evamevassa me vińń±ŗańc±yatanasahagat± sańń±manasik±r± samud±caranti. Svassa me hoti ±b±dho.
“Tassa mayha½, ±nanda, etadahosi– ‘ya½n³n±ha½ sabbaso ±kińcańń±yatana½ samatikkamma nevasańń±n±sańń±yatana½ upasampajja vihareyyan’ti. Tassa mayha½, ±nanda, nevasańń±n±sańń±yatane citta½ na pakkhandati nappas²dati na santiµµhati na vimuccati eta½ santanti passato. Tassa mayha½, ±nanda, etadahosi ‘ko nu kho hetu ko paccayo, yena me nevasańń±n±sańń±yatane citta½ na pakkhandati nappas²dati na santiµµhati na vimuccati eta½ santanti passato’? Tassa mayha½, ±nanda, etadahosi– ‘±kińcańń±yatane kho me ±d²navo adiµµho, so ca me abahul²kato, nevasańń±n±sańń±yatane ca ±nisa½so anadhigato, so ca me an±sevito. Tasm± me nevasańń±n±sańń±yatane citta½ na pakkhandati nappas²dati na santiµµhati na vimuccati eta½ santanti passato’. Tassa mayha½, ±nanda, etadahosi– ‘sace kho aha½ ±kińcańń±yatane ±d²nava½ disv± ta½ bahula½ kareyya½, nevasańń±n±sańń±yatane ±nisa½sa½ adhigamma tam±seveyya½, µh±na½ kho paneta½ vijjati ya½ me nevasańń±n±sańń±yatane citta½ pakkhandeyya pas²deyya santiµµheyya vimucceyya eta½ santanti passato’. So kho aha½, ±nanda, aparena samayena ±kińcańń±yatane ±d²nava½ disv± ta½ bahulamak±si½, nevasańń±n±sańń±yatane ±nisa½sa½ adhigamma tam±sevi½. Tassa mayha½, ±nanda, nevasańń±n±sańń±yatane citta½ pakkhandati pas²dati santiµµhati vimuccati eta½ santanti passato. So kho aha½, ±nanda, sabbaso ±kińcańń±yatana½ samatikkamma nevasańń±n±sańń±yatana½ upasampajja vihar±mi. Tassa mayha½, ±nanda, imin± vih±rena viharato ±kińcańń±yatanasahagat± sańń±manasik±r± samud±caranti. Svassa me hoti ±b±dho. Seyyath±pi, ±nanda, sukhino dukkha½ uppajjeyya y±vadeva ±b±dh±ya; evamevassa me ±kińcańń±yatanasahagat± sańń±manasik±r± samud±caranti. Svassa me hoti ±b±dho.
“Tassa mayha½, ±nanda, etadahosi– ‘ya½n³n±ha½ nevasańń±n±sańń±yatana½ samatikkamma sańń±vedayitanirodha½ upasampajja vihareyyan’ti. Tassa mayha½, ±nanda, sańń±vedayitanirodhe citta½ na pakkhandati nappas²dati na santiµµhati na vimuccati eta½ santanti passato. Tassa mayha½, ±nanda, etadahosi– ‘ko nu kho hetu, ko paccayo, yena me sańń±vedayitanirodhe citta½ na pakkhandati nappas²dati na santiµµhati na vimuccati eta½ santanti passato’? Tassa mayha½, ±nanda, etadahosi– ‘nevasańń±n±sańń±yatane kho me ±d²navo adiµµho, so ca me abahul²kato, sańń±vedayitanirodhe ca ±nisa½so anadhigato, so ca me an±sevito. Tasm± me sańń±vedayitanirodhe citta½ na pakkhandati nappas²dati na santiµµhati na vimuccati eta½ santanti passato’. Tassa mayha½, ±nanda, etadahosi– ‘sace kho aha½ nevasańń±n±sańń±yatane ±d²nava½ disv± ta½ bahula½ kareyya½, sańń±vedayitanirodhe ±nisa½sa½ adhigamma tam±seveyya½, µh±na½ kho paneta½ vijjati ya½ me sańń±vedayitanirodhe citta½ pakkhandeyya pas²deyya santiµµheyya vimucceyya eta½ santanti passato’. So kho aha½, ±nanda, aparena samayena nevasańń±n±sańń±yatane ±d²nava½ disv± ta½ bahulamak±si½ sańń±vedayitanirodhe ±nisa½sa½ adhigamma tam±sevi½. Tassa mayha½, ±nanda, sańń±vedayitanirodhe citta½ pakkhandati pas²dati santiµµhati vimuccati eta½ santanti passato. So kho aha½, ±nanda, sabbaso nevasańń±n±sańń±yatana½ samatikkamma sańń±vedayitanirodha½ upasampajja vihar±mi, pańń±ya ca me disv± ±sav± parikkhaya½ agama½su.
“Y±vak²vańc±ha½ ±nanda, im± nava anupubbavih±rasam±pattiyo na eva½ anulomapaµiloma½ sam±pajjimpi vuµµhahimpi, neva t±v±ha½, ±nanda, sadevake loke sam±rake sabrahmake sassamaŗabr±hmaŗiy± paj±ya sadevamanuss±ya ‘anuttara½ samm±sambodhi½ abhisambuddho’ti paccańń±si½. Yato ca kho aha½, ±nanda, im± nava anupubbavih±rasam±pattiyo eva½ anulomapaµiloma½ sam±pajjimpi vuµµhahimpi, ath±ha½, ±nanda, sadevake loke sam±rake sabrahmake sassamaŗabr±hmaŗiy± paj±ya sadevamanuss±ya ‘anuttara½ samm±sambodhi½ abhisambuddho’ti paccańń±si½. ѱŗańca pana me dassana½ udap±di– ‘akupp± me cetovimutti [vimutti (ka. s². ka.)], ayamantim± j±ti, natthi d±ni punabbhavo”’ti. Dasama½.

Mah±vaggo catuttho.

Tassudd±na½–
Dve vih±r± ca nibb±na½, g±v² jh±nena pańcama½;
±nando br±hmaŗ± devo, n±gena tapussena c±ti.