3. Pariññ±v±ravaººan±

206-208. Puggalok±sav±ro labbham±nop²ti kasm± vutta½, nanu ok±sav±rassa al±bhe tassapi al±bhena bhavitabbanti? Na, tattha puggalasseva pariññ±vacanato. Puggalok±sav±repi hi ok±se puggalasseva pariññ± vuccati, na ok±sassa. Ok±sav±ropi ca yadi vucceyya, “yattha r³pakkhandha½ parij±n±t²”ti ok±se puggalasseva parij±nanavasena vucceyya, tasm± puggalok±sav±rasseva labbham±nat± vutt±, na ok±sav±rass±ti. Ten±ha– “±mant±…pe… siy±”ti.
Tenev±ti pavatte cittakkhaºavasena tiººa½ addh±na½ l±bhato eva, aññath± cutipaµisandhikkhaºe r³pakkhandhaparij±nanassa abh±v± “yo r³pakkhandha½ parij±n±ti, so vedan±kkhandha½ parij±n±t²”ti ettha “natth²”ti vissajjanena bhavitabba½ siy±, “±mant±”ti ca katanti. Sanniµµh±nasa½sayapadasaªgahit±na½ pariññ±na½ pavatte cittakkhaºe eva l±bha½ dassento “lokuttaramaggakkhaºasmiñh²”ti-±dim±ha. Na parij±n±t²ti pañhe puthujjana½ sandh±ya ±mant±ti vuttanti ida½ puthujjanassa sabbath± pariññ±kiccassa abh±vato vutta½. “Arah± r³pakkhandha½ na parij±n±ti no ca vedan±kkhandha½ na parij±nittha, aggamaggasamaªgiñca arahantañca µhapetv± avases± puggal± r³pakkhandhañca na parij±nanti vedan±kkhandhañca na parij±nitth±”ti pana vacanena “aggamaggasamaªgi½ µhapetv± añño koci parij±n±t²”ti vattabbo natth²ti dassita½ hoti, tena tadavasesapuggale sandh±ya “±mant±”ti vuttanti viññ±yat²ti.

Pariññ±v±ravaººan± niµµhit±.

Khandhayamakavaººan± niµµhit±.