Niddesav±ravaººan±

26. Piyar³pa½ s±tar³panti “cakkhu½ loke piyar³pa½…pe… r³p± loke…pe… cakkhuviññ±ºa½…pe… cakkhusamphasso…pe… cakkhusamphassaj± vedan±…pe… r³pasaññ±…pe… r³pasañcetan±…pe… r³pataºh±…pe… r³pavitakko…pe… r³pavic±ro”ti (d². ni. 2.400; ma. ni. 1.133; vibha. 203) eva½ vutta½ taºh±vatthubh³ta½ tebh³maka½ veditabba½, tasm± ya½ pañcakkhandhasamud±yabh³ta½ piyar³pas±tar³pa½, ta½ ekadesena r³pakkhandho hot²ti ±ha “piyar³pa½ s±tar³pa½ r³pa½ na r³pakkhandho”ti. Piyasabh±vat±ya v± r³pakkhandho piyar³pe pavisati, na ruppanasabh±ven±ti “piyar³pa½ s±tar³pa½ r³pa½ na r³pakkhandho”ti vutta½. Saññ±yamake t±va diµµhisaññ±ti “viseso”ti vacanaseso. Tattha diµµhi eva saññ± diµµhisaññ±. “Saya½ sam±d±ya vat±ni jantu, ucc±vaca½ gacchati saññasatto”ti (su. ni. 798), “saññ±virattassa na santi ganth±”ti (su. ni. 853) ca evam±d²su hi diµµhi ca “saññ±”ti vutt±ti.
28. “Na khandh± na vedan±kkhandhoti? ¾mant±”ti eva½ khandhasaddappavattiy± abh±ve vedan±kkhandhasaddappavattiy± ca abh±voti paººattisodhanamattameva karot²ti daµµhabba½, na aññadhammasabbh±vo evettha pam±ºa½. Evañca katv± “n±yatan± na sot±yatananti? ¾mant±”ti-±di½ vakkhat²ti.
39. R³pato aññe vedan±dayoti ettha lokuttar± vedan±dayo daµµhabb±. Te hi piyar³p± ca s±tar³p± ca na honti taºh±ya an±rammaºatt±ti r³pato aññe hont²ti. R³pañca khandhe ca µhapetv± avases±ti idampi etehi saddhi½ na-sadd±na½ appavattimattameva sandh±ya vuttanti daµµhabba½. Evañca katv± “cakkhuñca ±yatane ca µhapetv± avases± na ceva cakkhu na ca ±yatan±”ti-±di½ (yama. 1.±yatanayamaka.15) vakkhati. Na hi tattha avasesaggahaºena gayham±na½ kañci atthi. Yadi siy±, dhamm±yatana½ siy±. Vakkhati hi “dhammo ±yatananti? ¾mant±”ti (yama. 1.±yatanayamaka.16). Taºh±vatthu ca na ta½ siy±. Yadi siy±, piyar³pas±tar³pabh±vato r³pa½ siy± “r³pa½ khandhoti? ¾mant±”ti (yama. 1.khandhayamaka.40) vacanato khandho c±ti. Aµµhakath±ya½ pana avijjam±nepi vijjam±na½ up±d±ya itthipuris±diggahaºasabbh±va½ sandh±ya avases±ti ettha paññattiy± gahaºa½ katanti veditabba½.

Niddesav±ravaººan± niµµhit±.